Skip to main content

Why blog now

I've had several failed attempts at blogging before, but it was always because of this primary reason - is it okay to reveal thoughts and feelings that I consider private? When I thought about blogging about geeky/work related stuff, I hesitated because I didn't want to appear stupid. After all what is the point of writing about information that is already available at a click of a button online. I didn't know if I had anything unique to write about.

The facebook generation we live in has changed all that. I see people posting the most mundane details of their life and still getting tons of replies. I realized I don't have to be perfect to start blogging. My posts may be banal at first but I am hoping the process of writing something everyday will make it better over time.

The theme of this blog - my life - Maya, my work, what I read online just anything that comes up that day.

Comments

  1. Nice, Pree! I had the same kind of feelings about blogging too. That is why my singleandsingular blog just had mostly just fictional stuff or poems and not so much personal insights and experiences kind of stuff. I had one other reason too: I have been reading everywhere how employers and interviewers always snoop around all your online presence; so I wasn't sure which topics are ok to be public about and which werent.
    My solution to it was that I started blogs that were just private to me. But now seeing this blog, makes me feel like it would be so cool if we (our friends circle) could share our experiences and feelings, esp. since we experience the same kind of things but never get an opportunity to share them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When two choices are enough

I came across the  power of two choices   theorem recently, it was referenced in a tech talk about schedulers. The central premise of the power of two choices is simple. Yet it is striking in its effectiveness in making decisions about routing requests. The following is my restatement of the premise: You have n options, and a score or rank associated with each of them. You also have an incoming queue of decisions to make about which option to pick. At each decision point, if you pick two options from the n at random, and then use the score to pick the best among those two, you will get exponentially better results (in terms of distributing load), than choosing a random option.  Going from best of two, to best of 3 or 4 or more, only improves the results by a constant factor.  Using power of two choices really starts to pay off when n is very large and examining all n options becomes prohibitively expensive.  The paper applies this to load balancing, whe...

My perspective of women in CS

For almost all of my professional life I have been very passionate about this topic. I am on the Anita Borg Institute  mailing list. I read various posts addressing this where they talk about why girls need more encouragement to get involved in CS from an early age and how gender stereotyping in schools is hurting their chances. Programs like  http://www.girlstart.org/  conduct camps and special events to encourage girls in STEM subjects, that I enthusiastically support. I got extremely worked up over this post ( http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/28/women-in-tech-stop-blaming-me/ ). Two years later it still makes me angry. There's no disputing the fact is that there are relatively very few women in this field, both entrepreneurs and working in the industry. There's also no disputing a facts like the last ten years of ACM programming champion teams are all men. Sure, there are stellar examples like Marissa Mayer, but what about all these women here who want to bre...

What's your black triangle?

There is a great post from 1994 about  black triangles  in the context of building large and complex systems. You might think that 1994 sounds like the dark ages, but the principles outlined in that post do stand the test of time. Here is my favorite excerpt from that post: What she later came to realize (and explain to others) was that the black triangle was a pioneer. It wasn’t just that we’d managed to get a triangle onto the screen. That could be done in about a day. It was the journey the triangle had taken to get up on the screen. It had passed through our new modeling tools, through two different intermediate converter programs, had been loaded up as a complete database, and been rendered through a fairly complex scene hierarchy, fully textured and lit (though there were no lights, so the triangle came out looking black). The black triangle demonstrated that the foundation was finally complete the core of a fairly complex system was completed, and we were now ready t...