Skip to main content

The casual parent

There was this article in TIME last year about " Helicopter parenting", their term for the kind of parent that constantly hovers & worries about every detail in their child's developmental milestones. In my opinions, some of the other things they do are:
  1. Constantly reads parenting articles and books and follows whatever the experts recommend.
  2. Keeps up to do date on all crime statistics in their neighborhood.
  3. Starts reading ISD reports on their elementary school even before their child turns one, just to watch out for performance lapses, if so its time to move, although they did originally decide to live wherever they are for the school district.
  4. Enrolls their kids in atleast five different classes before they turn 5.
  5. Their pediatrician always sets aside extra time for them because they tend to ask many questions.
I've always felt guilty that I was never like this..Then from time to time someone in my friends circle would mention something along the lines of the above and then full blown guilt hits me. I start making some grand plans about what I should do with my toddler. Should I move her to a better "Montessori" school? Should I enroll in her in some speech class? Why don't I know about my neighbourhood's crime profile..etc etc. The problem is this "guilt phase" lasts only a few days, then I go back to being the casual parent that I always have been. I read the Freakonomics book (that the time article mentions) recently and it was like I found my inner peace. It basically said that enough studies have shown that most of this stuff doesn't matter, what your child will do in life depends mostly on decisions that were made long back - like your education, your spouse, whether you had your kids too early.

But even as I write this, I feel guilty again. Should I be working on a blog post or reading a parenting article in the little free time I have? Sigh...

Comments

  1. Most parents in India follow the casual parenting styles - and we all turned out just fine, didn't we? :).
    Since I have been iviewing, I have been looking up the profiles of Directors and VPs and CEOs at the various companies - 80% of them did not go to any hi-profile schools or colleges - in fact their majors in college wasnt even remotely related to what they were doing in their careers. That is another indicator into the fact that too much early-stage fussing doesnt really carry over much to the significant portions of their life.

    I dont have ANY experience with kids whatsoever, but I think the important thing is to foster an environment of growth, thatz all. And that doesnt mean forcibly enrolling the kid in 10 classes - that just means exposing the kid to whatever is possible and allowing him/her to gravitate towards what catches their interest.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are your future plans? Why are you *still* a developer?

If I had a nickel for every time someone has asked me that question I'd have enough change for a year? Inspired by my friend's post here , I thought I'd write about how I ended up doing what I do now. Then I thought about it some more and decided to write about something else. Is it important to know where you are going in life? If you aren't moving forward in your career does it mean that you are doing something wrong? What does "moving up the ladder" even mean? I am going to attempt to answer these questions for myself. Its almost 5 years since I began my professional career. It has been great so far, lots of ups some downs as well. However, once in a while when I get the title question it still throws me off. It is usually my parents or well meaning relatives, sometimes friends that ask this. I have nothing much to say to them except "I enjoy what I am doing right now, haven't really thought about the future". But the truth is - I have thou

Craigslist, wrong calls and me

I have the worst luck when it comes to getting wrong calls on my phone. Why do I say that? It started a few weeks ago with a phone call - "I'm calling to ask about the Nissan altima you have on sale". I replied saying wrong number yada yada etc. After the third call like this, I finally asked them where they found the ad and it turned out to be Craigslist. One google search later I found the ad listing my number, probably a typo. Contacted them via Cragislist and asked them to correct it. End of story, right? Two days later, I got ANOTHER call, here is how it went. Caller: Maam, Im calling about the toyota four runner for sale Me: You mean the Altima, that was a mistake in the ad. I am not the seller and it has been corrected in the ad online. Caller: Is your number 602-*******? That's what's on there.. Me:ARGGH Another google search, and I find a DIFFERENT Craigslist ad in another city, listing my number. What are the chances of this happening to the same perso

Don't teach programming by asking students to program - What?

Saw this article in one of the ACM blogs that cited a recent study in an educational psychology journal on how teaching introductory Cs students to program by having them write code actually has a detrimental effect. More details here . I absolutely disagree with the author that this study has implications in CS! First of all it cites a study done with teaching algebra so it is a different domain. I think that the problem is that there is too little programming going on rather than too much. I also wonder of anyone has considered that an introductory programming class probably has a mix of two very different types of students - one just exploring CS as one of many career options, the other the kind that took their dad's computer apart in the garage and started programming at age 8. The latter kind still have to take the introductory class because of degree requirements but now it gives you a class sample that's skewed and hard to make any conclusions about. If everyone that to